Relationship extent

Relationship extent

Many reports examine relationship timeframe and quite often infer that length is really a proxy for closeness within the relationship. Generally speaking, as intimate relationships upsurge in duration, condom usage decreases (Civic 1999; Crosby et al. 2000; Ku et al. 1994; Manning et al. 2009). More over, a tendency is had by this pattern to duplicate it self in subsequent relationships. Ku et al. ’s (1994) sawtooth hypothesis describes this noticed pattern by which teenage boys utilize condoms early on in intimate relationships, then utilize diminishes with relationship timeframe, which in turn increases once more at the beginning of a relationship that is subsequent. Other work has discovered a bad relationship exists between extent and regularly making use of contraception ( ag e.g., Aalsma et al. 2006; Brady et al. 2009; Fortenberry et al. 2002; Ku et al. 1994; Manlove et al. 2005). Likewise, Kusunoki and Upchurch (2010) report reduced quantities of condom usage than hormone practices with greater relationship timeframe. A more comprehensive approach to adult relationships requires attention to relationship qualities and dynamics other than duration while longer duration may be associated with declines in condom use.

Subjective characteristics

While building on these scholarly studies, we focus attention from the subjective aspects of relationships. A couple of studies realize that psychological closeness and higher relationship quality among subgroups of adults and teenagers are both connected with reduced condom and contraceptive usage ( e.g., Aalsma et al. 2006; Brady et al. 2009; Gutierrez et al. 2000; Inazu 1987; Katz et al. 2000; Manning et al. 2009; Pleck, Sonenstein, and Swain 1988; Santelli et al. 1996). Manlove et al. (2004) report that greater activitiages which are intimatee.g., telling other people these were a few, heading out together, telling one another “I adore you, ” conference each other’s moms and dads) are related to persistence of contraceptive usage among male respondents. Read more